|
|
| Nancy and her "imaging team"
have claimed the full moon on the 18th spoiled the images. IF they knew how to process them in the first place, they wouldn't have to use excuses for not sighting their "object" in the images! I fully expect Nancy to hijack these processed images and claim PX has been detected. If she and her "imaging team" does, they are lying. Nancy's imaging team's analysis is lame and Dell keeps circling noise. No where in the known universe does an object possess a red and white "persona" as claimed by these scam artists. One would do well to wonder why their noise doesn't brighten if it's due to pass earth on May 15th, 2003. |
| Above
is a close up copy of an image using sum centered on the area where PX is suppose to be. The image is quite noisy because improper calibration frames were provided for use. As you can see, the images are NOT ruined by a full moon! |
| Above is a close up of the
master image using median combine. It contains much less noise than the sum image first shown. Magnitudes easily go down to 19.5/20 magnitude. Problem is there's nothing for Nancy and her team to circle... other than noise! |
| Above
is a master using median bicubic which is still extremely noisy. Still, magnitudes are detected to 19.5 and still nothing unusual was detected in the area where PX is suppose to exist! |
|
This is the washed-out image caused by moonlight claimed by Nancy and her "imaging team" preventing her from performing "analysis". Me thinks they should first learn how to take proper images THEN learn how toprocess them properly! A BIG note of caution here... I fully expect Nancy and Dell to hijack my processed images and claim that thru my "superior imaging process" have caught PX where they couldn't. If they do, they'll be circling noise as there is NOTHING in these images that would suggest PX exists! |